Small Sample Tests : Tests based on:-1. Chi square (χ2) distribution 2. t- distribution 3. F- distribution
Small
Sample Tests
We have seen large sample tests for
testing hypothesis about population mean, population proportion and population
correlation coefficient. However in number of situations exact tests or small
sample tests can be used for testing hypothesis about a population parameter
under some assumptions.
In small
sample tests, the statistic follows exact sampling distribution viz.
Tests
based on:-
1. Chi square (χ2)
distribution
2. t- distribution
3. F- distribution
Chi-square test for goodness of fit:
Let Oi, i=1, 2, 3,.....k is a set of observed frequencies and Ei, i=1,
2, 3,.....k is the corresponding set of expected frequencies. Under H0,
the sum of observed and expected frequencies is equal.
Here we have to test null hypothesis,
H0: There is no significant difference between the observed
and expected frequencies or the fitting is good.
Against, H1: There is
significant difference between the observed and expected frequencies or fitting
is not good.
Under
the null hypothesis, Karl Pearson proved that the statistic,
1.
We can apply this test, if expected frequencies are greater than or equal to 5
and total frequency is greater than 50.
2.
When
expected frequency of a class is less than 5, the class is merged into
neighboring class along with its observed and expected frequencies until total
of expected frequencies becomes greater than or equal to 5. This is called
‘pooling the classes’ and number of class frequencies after pooling is the
value of k.
3.
If any parameter is not estimated while fitting a probability distribution or
obtaining expected frequencies the value of the p is zero.
ii) Test for Independence of
Attributes:
A/B |
B1 |
B2 |
................ |
Bj |
................ |
Bn |
Total |
A1 |
(A1B1) |
(A1B2) |
................ |
(A1Bj) |
................ |
(A1Bn) |
(A1) |
A2 |
(A2B1) |
(A2B2) |
................ |
(A2Bj) |
................ |
(A2Bn) |
(A2) |
: : |
: : |
: : |
: : |
: : |
: : |
: : |
: : |
Ai |
(AiB1) |
(AiB2) |
................ |
(AiBj) |
................ |
(AiBn) |
(Ai) |
: : |
: : |
: : |
: : |
: : |
: : |
: : |
: : |
Am |
(AmB1) |
(AmB2) |
................ |
(AmBj) |
................ |
(AmBn) |
(Am) |
Total |
(B1) |
(B2) |
................ |
(Bj) |
................ |
(Bn) |
N |
i.e.
H0: Attributes A and B are independent against the alternative
H1: Attributes A and B are not
independent.
Under
the null hypothesis that the attributes A and B are independent, the expected
frequencies are calculated as follows;
For 2 ×2 contingency table under the hypothesis of independence of A and B,
B A |
B1 |
B2 |
Total |
A1 |
a |
b |
(a+b) |
A2 |
c |
d |
(c+d) |
Total |
(a+c) |
(b+d) |
a+b+c+d= N |
Comments
Post a Comment